Section 3. The Nature of Illusion
(Summary 3: Subhuti questions how an illusory thought can know full enlightenment, prompting the Lord to probe whether illusion or such thoughts are real entities; upon denial, he affirms that enlightenment-knowing dharmas are not separate from illusion. Subhuti notes the absolute isolation of perfection of wisdom and enlightenment, making development or knowing impossible through isolation, but the Lord explains that isolated enlightenment is known precisely through isolated wisdom, without forming notions of isolation. Subhuti describes this as coursing in an unfathomable object, a hard task for Bodhisattvas who avoid realizing lesser levels; the Lord agrees, but Subhuti counters that no real Bodhisattva or realization exists, yet those undaunted by this course in wisdom without reviewing facts or discriminating distances to enlightenment or lesser paths.
-
The dialogue uses analogies: space, illusory men, reflections, Tathagatas, fictitious creatures, and wooden puppets lack discrimination, performing actions without notions of near/far or dear/undear; similarly, the perfection of wisdom, forsaking constructions, enables Bodhisattvas to perform liberating work without discrimination, constituted as such in its inherent nature.)
.
TEXT: Subhuti: But how can a thought which is like illusion know full enlightenment?
The Lord: Subhuti, do you see the thought which is like illusion as a separate real entity?
Subhuti: No, Lord.
The Lord: Do you see illusion as a separate real entity?
Subhuti: No, Lord.
The Lord: So, as you see neither illusion, nor the thought which is like illusion, as a real separate entity, do you now perhaps see this dharma which knows full enlightenment as something other than illusion, or as something other than the thought which is like illusion?
Subhuti: No, Lord. I do not. In consequence, to which dharma can I point, and say "it is" or "it is not?" To a dharma which is absolutely isolated one cannot attribute "it is" or "it is not." Also any absolutely isolated dharma can not know full enlightenment. Here now, O Lord, the Perfection-of-Wisdom is absolutely isolated. But any dharma which is absolutely isolated, this is not a dharma which can be developed, nor does this bring about or remove any dharma. So, how can a Bodhisattva, by resorting to an absolutely isolated perfection of wisdom, know full enlightenment? Even full enlightenment is absolutely isolated. As, O Lord, the perfection of wisdom is absolutely isolated, and as full enlightenment is absolutely isolated, how can the isolated become known through the isolated?
The Lord: So it is, Subhuti. It is just as this perfection of wisdom is absolutely isolated that absolutely isolated full enlightenment is known [by this]. But as a Bodhisattva forms such a notion as "the perfection of wisdom is absolutely isolated," this is not the perfection of wisdom. It is thus certain, thanks to perfecting wisdom a Bodhisattva can know full enlightenment, and one cannot know this without resorting to this. The isolated cannot be known by the isolated, and nevertheless a Bodhisattva knows full enlightenment, and does not know this without resorting to the perfection of wisdom.
Subhuti: As I understand the meaning of the Lord's teaching, a Bodhisattva in this way courses/abides in an unfathomable object.
The Lord: A doer of what is hard is the Bodhisattva which courses/abides in an unfathomable object, and which yet does not realize such object [or: gain], i.e. on the level of Sravaka, Disciple or Pratyekabuddha.
Subhuti: As I understand the meaning of the Lord's teaching, here is in this way no Bodhisattva at all which is any doer of what is hard. As this very dharma is not got at which is realized, nor anything whatsoever which can be revealed or realized, nor anything whatsoever by means of which one can realize. So, as this is being taught, as a Bodhisattva is not despondent, cowed or stolid, does not turn back, and remains unafraid, this one courses/abides in the Perfection-of-Wisdom. As one does not review this as a certain fact as one courses/abides, one such courses/abides in the Perfection-of-Wisdom. As one does not review this as a real fact one is near to full enlightenment, one such as this courses/abides in the Perfection-of-Wisdom. As it does not even occur to one that one is keeping aloof from the level of Disciples and Pratyekabuddhas, this one courses/abides in the Perfection-of-Wisdom. This does not occur to space, "I am near to this, or, I am far from that," for space can not make such discriminations, just so it can not in truth occur to a Bodhisattva which courses/abides in the Perfection-of-Wisdom..."full enlightenment is near to me, the level of Sravaka, Disciple or Pratyekabuddha is far from me."
The perfection of wisdom does not make any discriminations. It is as with a man created by magical illusion to which (!) it does not occur "the conjurer is near to 'me', but this assembled crowd of spectators is far from 'me'." For illusory men make no such discriminations. It is as with the reflection of an object in a mirror or in water, to which it does not occur "the object which produces the reflection is near to 'me', but these who come along and cast the reflection in the mirror or in water, are far from 'me'." For this reflection of an object makes no discrimination. Just as Tathagata, as one which forsakes all constructions and discriminations, finds nothing dear or not dear, just so a Bodhisattva which courses/abides in perfecting wisdom, for here is no discrimination on the part of the Perfection-of-Wisdom. Just as Tathagata is one which forsakes all constructions and discriminations, even so the Perfection-of-Wisdom forsakes all constructions and discriminations. It does not occur to a fictitious creature which Tathagata magically conjures up "the level of Sravakas, Disciples and Pratyekabuddhas is far from 'me', full enlightenment is near to 'me'," for any fictitious creature can not make any discriminations. In the same way a Bodhisattva which courses/abides in the Perfection-of-Wisdom does not think "the level of Sravakas, Disciples and Pratyekabuddhas is far from 'me', full enlightenment is near to 'me'," and this simply due to an absence of any and all discrimination on the part of the perfection of wisdom. A fictitious creature [which has been conjured up by the Tathagata] to do a certain work [in converting beings], performs this work, but remains without discrimination, just due to being so constituted as it lacks all discrimination. Just so a Bodhisattva performs the work for the sake of which one develops this perfection of wisdom, but this perfection of wisdom remains without discrimination, due to the fact as it is so constituted it lacks all discrimination. An expert mason, or mason's apprentice, makes of wood an automatic man or woman, a puppet which can be moved by pulling the strings. Whatever action it is made to perform, this action it performs, yet this wooden machine has no discrimination. Just due to the fact as it is so constituted that it lacks all discrimination. Just so a Bodhisattva performs this work for the sake of which one develops this perfection of wisdom, but this perfection of wisdom remains without discrimination, just due to the fact that this perfection of wisdom is so constituted it lacks all discriminations.